Teaching with AI — Case Study · Kira Shinn Design

Instructional Design · Case Study

Teaching with
Artificial Intelligence

A complete professional development training series built from scratch — curriculum map, interactive slide decks, and printable handouts — for two distinct audiences: K–12 educators and corporate executives.

Instructional Design ADDIE HTML / CSS / JS Curriculum Development PD Design
Project Overview

Type

PD Training Series

Two full programs, two audiences

Scope

3-Day + Modular

18-hr K–12 series + 3-hr exec module

Deliverables

6 Files

Outlines, slides, printable handouts

Standards

ISTE · ESSA

Fully aligned scope & sequence

The Brief

AI literacy is increasingly critical across every sector — but most existing training treats the topic either too technically, or not seriously enough. The brief was to design two versions of a professional development experience: one for K–12 teachers, coaches, and administrators navigating AI in their classrooms; and a second, modular version for corporate executives who need fluency without a technical background.

Both programs needed to be practical, evidence-grounded, and immediately actionable. Participants should leave with something they made and a plan for what they'll do in the next 30 days.

Design Approach
1
Audience Analysis & Scope
Defined two distinct audiences with different contexts, stakes, and vocabulary. K–12 educators needed ethics-first framing and classroom-applicable tools; executives needed business-risk framing and decision-ready frameworks.
2
Curriculum Mapping (ADDIE)
Built full scope and sequence documents for both programs — learning objectives by session, standards alignment (ISTE, ESSA, DLP), competency matrices, and role-differentiated content tracks for the K–12 series.
3
Visual Design System
Designed two distinct visual languages: a warm editorial aesthetic (amber/teal/purple) for the educator training, and a sharp dark executive aesthetic (charcoal/electric blue) for the corporate module. Fully consistent across all six deliverable files.
4
Handout Design for Retention
Designed all handouts as working artifacts — not note-taking pages. The RICE worksheet, lesson design sprint template, 90-day action plan, and PREP prompt framework are tools participants keep using after the workshop ends.
5
Interactive HTML Delivery
Built all six deliverables as standalone HTML files — no dependencies, no accounts, runs in any browser. Slide decks support keyboard navigation, touch swipe, and dot navigation. Handouts are print-optimized with correct page breaks.
K–12 Educator Training — 3 Days · 18 Hours

A comprehensive three-day intensive designed for K–12 classroom teachers, instructional coaches, and school administrators. Each day builds on the last, with a clear theme: Understand → Integrate → Sustain.

Day 01
AI Literacy & Foundations
"Understand before you use"
  • How LLMs work — non-technical primer
  • Hands-on first prompt session
  • Ethics & equity seminar (4 stations)
  • School & district policy workshop
  • Reflection journal + homework
Day 02
Classroom Integration
"Design with intention"
  • Prompt engineering — RICE framework
  • Subject-area breakout labs (6 tracks)
  • Lesson design sprint (5-step template)
  • Academic integrity seminar
  • Peer feedback protocol
Day 03
Assessment & Sustainability
"Build change that lasts"
  • Lesson plan lightning showcase
  • Reimagining assessment for AI era
  • Assessment redesign studio
  • Teacher productivity lab
  • 90-day action plan + closing

Standards Aligned To

ISTE Standards for Educators ISTE Standards for Students ESSA Title I · II · IV Digital Literacy & Practice Standards 1–8
Corporate Executive Module — 3 Hours · Half-Day

A modular half-day intensive for senior leaders — part of an 8-module executive series. Designed to build AI fluency without technical depth: a mental model, a prompting framework, and a written 30-day action agenda.

Framework

PREP Prompting

Purpose · Role · Examples · Parameters — structured briefing framework designed for executive workflows

Risk Coverage

4 Critical Risks

Data leakage, hallucination, bias & liability, and vendor lock-in — with governance checklist in the handout

Output

30-Day P/T/G Plan

Personal, Team, and Governance actions — stated publicly before participants leave

All Deliverables

Six standalone HTML files — each opens in any browser with no dependencies.

K–12 Educator Series

Teaching with AI — 3-Day PD

Warm editorial aesthetic · amber / teal / purple day system · 22-slide deck · 6 handouts

Corporate Executive Module

AI Fluency for Leaders — Module 1

Dark premium aesthetic · charcoal / electric blue · 13-slide deck · 3 handouts

Key Design Decisions

Two distinct visual languages

The K–12 and executive programs use completely different palettes, type systems, and aesthetic registers — because the same visual language does not work for a kindergarten teacher and a CFO. The design reinforces who the training is for before anyone reads a word.

Handouts as working artifacts

Every handout was designed to be used after the workshop, not just during it. The PREP prompt framework lives on desks. The 90-day plan gets pinned to walls. The tool evaluation card informs purchasing decisions. Retention-first design from the start.

HTML over PPTX for portability

All slides are built as HTML rather than PowerPoint — keyboard navigable, touch-swipeable, runs offline, no version mismatch. The visual fidelity is higher, the file size is lower, and the facilitator never has to worry about fonts rendering correctly on a projector.

Role differentiation within shared content

The K–12 curriculum doesn't treat teachers, coaches, and administrators as the same audience. Breakout tracks, callout boxes, and specific activities are labeled by role so each participant gets content relevant to their actual job — without running three separate trainings.

Reflection

The most interesting design challenge in this project was writing about AI literacy without either overhyping or dismissing the technology — and doing that twice, for two audiences who have fundamentally different stakes in the answer. A classroom teacher asking "will this hurt my students?" and an executive asking "will this hurt my company?" are both right to be cautious, but for completely different reasons. The curriculum had to hold both of those questions seriously.

Kira Shinn · Instructional Designer & Developer

More Work

Browse the full design portfolio
or get in touch about a project.